Monday, January 11, 2010

We Told You So

IPS B.S. told you this was coming. Twenty-two teachers have been taken out the classroom for not controlling their students or mastering the material. There's no doubt we have some bad apples in our bunch, but this can also be a reason to get rid of "troublemakers who challenge authority." Watch your back, your front and your side.

48 comments:

  1. Andy Gammill's article on The Star website today was a really pathetic suck-up job for the IPS administration. I wonder if he is on their payroll?

    He makes a statement that is an opinion - that struggling IPS teachers haven't been weeded out by past administrations - but gives no supporting facts or figures to support this accusation. So, it is "someone's" opinion not attributed to the source of that accusation. Is it Andy's opinion?
    If so, then it should be presented as commentary instead of news.

    This article reveals two things:

    1. Bush league journalism that wouldn't get a passing grade in a high school class.

    2. The Star is anti-teacher and pro this administration. But I guess we already knew this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh come now...we all know of teachers who have been shuffled from school to school because they were not effective. We also know that it has been too problematic to deal with these teachers. If you have never encountered a teacher who really needs to find another career, then I want to teach where you are. And the administration should bear responsibility for not putting these folks on PIPs long ago. J. Ajabu reported how few teachers have been removed in the past and the article mentioned that.

    ReplyDelete
  3. If you think there are only a few bad apples in the bunch, then you are blind. Too many teachers bust their asses each day trying to help these students. For those that have been on improvement plans and continue to fail....get them out!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh come on now, we know administrators that have been shufled from school to school and needs to be fired. Oh, lets see the fool at the desk at George Washington Community School will "pass" the mentor phase and was given an easy job. We have a sad school board that has no idea how to run a school system. Many of the teachers were not given the support, time, and one administrator changed dates on paperwork, lets get real most of this was personal feelings, not based on data or observation by the administrator. This will come out in the news and after the full process, that will cost IPS money.

    ReplyDelete
  5. When will there be a bunch of administrative "bad apples" that are put in the Cadre pool, or fired? I would love to see some of our principals actually having to go into classrooms and practice what they have preached!

    ReplyDelete
  6. So the Cadre is a form of punishment? What makes you think you are any better than them?

    ReplyDelete
  7. IPS had a list of principals to get rid of a couple of years ago. Someone didn't inform them early enough and they were unable to terminate their contracts. IPS now uses them as the people who go from school to school looking for dirt in corners. Nice demotion.... they make as much as before, but have much less responsibility.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Kay Kelley anyone???

    ReplyDelete
  9. Does anyone have access to the names of the twenty-two teachers?

    ReplyDelete
  10. http://www.indystar.com/article/20100111/LOCAL/1110358/IPS-cites-poor-performance-as-22-pulled-from-teaching

    According to the article, these teachers will be receiving additional training the remainder of the year. They will then be GIVEN ANOTHER CHANCE to improve their performance next year under probation. I would assume they are still on salary, therefore they aren't terminated at this point. Doesn't that indicate that someone is trying to help them with their performance if they are given several months of improvement training and another opportunity?

    ReplyDelete
  11. I remember clearly the day in September of 2008 when Larry Yarrell laughed loudly to a group of educators visiting at Northwest about the loser sped teacher he had sent to Marshall on a PIP. He thought it was hilarious that he'd pulled such a fait accompli and handed off his failure to another school.

    We all knew that if a principal placed a teacher on a PIP that the principal was not allowed to send the teacher to another school without first implementing the 'performance improvement plan' he had designed and established. Larry Yarrell did not follow the guidelines.

    To the contrary, he literally bragged publicly about shuffling this teacher to another school. Yarrell was so blatant that he had the nerve to say that this teacher was an early Christmas gift for the Marshall principal. How's that for professionalism?

    ReplyDelete
  12. The newspaper article stated that two of the 22 teachers will lose their jobs at the end of the year and will not get a second chance.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Yes, you need to watch your back, but you also better be well liked by Jim Hill. That man has more power than most people realize.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Jim Hill has ultimate power - look at how much he has managed to make off of our system. Tread lightly.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Jimmy Hill is one of our neighbors from the South. Big Jimmy retired from Kentucky and now is plying his lucrative trade here in Indiana, like so many of our consultants do. Suppose he's a sort of mercenary for IPS. They pay him huge sums of money to do what they are unable or unwilling to do. Here are his credentials from the Kentucky Dept. of Education website. As predicted, he started out a PE teacher.
    _____________________________________________
    Education Professional Standards Board

    SearchCredentialsRoles
    James Gilbert Hill

    Credentials



    RANK1 Rank I 07-01-1975
    Cert Issued
    B87 Teaching Major: Health-Physical Education -
    E88 Endorsement For Elementary School Physical Education 05-13-1972
    FEP Endorsement For Elementary School Principal, Grades K-8 07-01-1975
    FSP Endorsement For Secondary School Principal, Grades 7-12 07-01-1973 Date. Lifetime
    SHM Standard High School Certificate, Grades 7-12 05-13-1972 Lifetime

    Note: Suspended and revoked credentials are shown with red text with a strike through line.


    Information contained on this page is subject to change, reprogramming, modifications of format, and availability at the direction of the Education Professional Standards Board (EPSB), and may not at any particular moment reflect the true status of permissions for a certified educator due to ordinary limitations, delay, or error in the system's operation.

    The EPSB disclaims any warranties as to the validity of the information obtained from this page. The recipient is solely responsible for verifying information received through cross-referencing the official record in the EPSB's Division of Certification. The EPSB shall not be liable to the recipient, or to any third party using the system or information obtained therefrom, for any damages whatsoever arising out of the use of this application.

    Please contact the Division of Certification with any questions on credentials or permissions.

    Email DCERT@KY.GOV regarding questions or concerns about any of the data displayed.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Mike Suttles is one of Jim Hill's consulant partners from Kentucky. Suttles states that he was a school principal in Kentucky, but a quick search from the KY DOE website does not verify administrative certification/licenses for Suttles. He was licensed as a special education teacher. Experts from afar -- be very skeptical of what they list as their credentials! Below are Suttles Kentucky licenses and credentials.
    _____________________________________________

    Education Professional Standards Board

    Select an ApplicationHighly Qualified CalculatorKentucky Educator Certification InquiryKEPP Report CardEPSB WebSite


    SearchCredentialsRoles
    Stephen Michael Suttles

    Credentials


    Cred Description Effective Expiration

    RANK1 Rank I 07-01-1995

    E03 Endorsement For Special Education--Educable Mentally Retarded, Grades 1-8 12-15-1978 Lifetime

    PEB Provisional Elementary Certificate, Grades 1-8 12-15-1978 Lifetime

    PLD Provisional Certificate For Teachers Of Exceptional Children-Learning And Behavior Disorder, Grades K-12 12-18-1980 Lifetime

    Note: Suspended and revoked credentials are shown with red text with a strike through line.


    Information contained on this page is subject to change, reprogramming, modifications of format, and availability at the direction of the Education Professional Standards Board (EPSB), and may not at any particular moment reflect the true status of permissions for a certified educator due to ordinary limitations, delay, or error in the system's operation.

    The EPSB disclaims any warranties as to the validity of the information obtained from this page. The recipient is solely responsible for verifying information received through cross-referencing the official record in the EPSB's Division of Certification. The EPSB shall not be liable to the recipient, or to any third party using the system or information obtained therefrom, for any damages whatsoever arising out of the use of this application.

    Please contact the Division of Certification with any questions on credentials or permissions.

    Email DCERT@KY.GOV regarding questions or concerns about any of the data displayed.

    ReplyDelete
  17. As for Larry Yarrell at Northwest High School, please review the website. http://mustang.doe.state.in.us/SEARCH/snapshot.cfm?schl=5483

    The enrollment and academic achievement at all grade levels has declined since he became Principal. Please come and visit our school. Its a high school built for over 2000 students and we have only 700 students. Come see it to believe it.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Regarding Jimmy Hill: One of the two teachers who were fired, (with no second chance) was in our building, and Jimmy Hill, (and others) were around and well aware of him/her.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Larry Yarrell is not what he claims to be. He is dishonest and unethical.

    ReplyDelete
  20. @Yarrell above

    He also lacks professionalism and even a surface knowledge of instructional strategies. There's not another school district where he could be hired as a principal. He'd never make it through the first round of interviews.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I have questions about the 22 teachers referenced:

    1) young, middle-aged, or older
    2) years experience - on average
    3) level of education
    4) gender
    5) ethnicity/race
    6) secondary or elementary
    7) any other defining commonalities

    ReplyDelete
  22. What building did you say had the teacher with NO second chance? And what does Jim Hill have to do with it. Did he fire the person?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Fire teachers who"cannot manage classrooms" and hurt the students? How about deans and principals that do this for the entire high school? Please chime in: how are your deans and principals doing creating safe atmospheres in hallways, buildings and campuses??

    ReplyDelete
  24. Excuse me, but there are far more teachers per building to supervise hallways than there are deans, assistant principals and principals. Creating safe atmospheres conducive to instruction and learning is the job of ALL school staff - period!

    ReplyDelete
  25. if the increased number of administrators and instructional coaches would spend some time in the hallways that would make a difference. We all know that the instructional coaches are "specially talented" people and couldn't be bothered with helping maintain safe hallways. Of course, we know most of them fled the classroom because they couldn't relate to the students or maintain order in their rooms. I will be kind. I could name 3 or 4 that I personally know that is true.

    ReplyDelete
  26. You know, I honestly don't know what the answer is. Like others, I always worry that administration will unfairly target the most expensive teachers (those with the most seniority). And in my own experience, the worst teachers are often very new teachers. But the second-worst are teachers who insist that the proper way to teach is the same as it was 20 years ago and that it is parents and students who need to adapt to their traditional way of teaching. If those teachers won't change, "refuse to be educated" so to speak, then I absolutely think the right thing to do is get rid of them. I can only think of three teachers in my entire school that are like this, but their negative impact is immense. They should have been fired years ago. And I don't think any of them were included in these 22 teachers.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I find it hard to believe that there were only 22 teachers.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I know, right?!

    ReplyDelete
  29. I do think the bad apples are the minority, but I agree there are way more than 22 in the district.

    ReplyDelete
  30. SUBJECTIVE!!!

    ReplyDelete
  31. What's subjective? That bad apples are the minority? Or that there are more than 22 in the district? And what on this blog is NOT subjective. And if you think only objective criteria should be used to evaluate teachers, then what objective criteria should that be? Where do you work that bad teachers aren't a problem? Why do some teachers insist on aligning themselves with the lowest in our profession. There are too many good teachers out there and it's insulting to act like we're all the same. We're not the same AT ALL. Some of us are really good at what we do. And some of us are really bad. And it's not a betrayal to say that. And it's not a betrayal to admit that our students would be better off without them.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Parents perspective. From a prior post, "Some of us are relly good at what we do". From my experience Some should be Most. Pray for those in Haiti.

    ReplyDelete
  33. If only Jim Hill had the power that you think he has. HA!!
    You forgot to add that he ran a Blue Ribbon school in Kentucky. Also, the $$$(not from general fund) that his company is paid includes the salaries for several people who are doing other jobs for IPS ie Teah High School's InSAI plan(s). Did you really think he was getting all the money-please!!!!!

    He did not have any input into the teachers that were displaced-why don't you ask your principals who decided which teachers would go!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    SOMEONE NEEDS TO GET THEIR FACTS STRAIGHT!!

    ReplyDelete
  34. You need to learn to type or communicate in a language that people understand. You Ed. Center people are all the same.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Someone sure seems testy when it comes to Jim Hill.
    Please tell me you are joking when you say that we are paying someone to do InSAI plans for Tech. I WISH someone would help me with our school's plan that I am doing by myself.

    ReplyDelete
  36. I'm not a teacher but it appears to me the InSAI plans are a cut and paste. At any rate, I don't understand what the plans are communicating. I quess I'm just part of the uneducated public.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Let's do the math. Gammill says that more than 20 principals turned in names. Twenty-two teachers were removed from their assigned classrooms. There were three removed from one building. That leaves 19 teachers who were removed from other buildings. 19+1(building with 3 teachers removed)=20 So if more than 20 principals made recommendations, some teachers who were suggested must have been pardoned. Who did this? What was the criteria? (Or was some poor schmuck who works in more than one school named by more than one principal?)

    ReplyDelete
  38. Wow...that sounds like an Algebra problem...I think the "pardoned" ones were freed because some administrators and deans did not do the observations and paperwork, etc. Some who escaped have survived to deprive kids for another semester, it seems.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Actually, close to 200 names were submitted by principals. The union intervened and that list was dwindled to 22. Of those, multiple lawsuits have been initiated.

    ReplyDelete
  40. bullshit.

    ReplyDelete
  41. "Of those, multiple lawsuits have been initiated."

    Keep those lawsuits coming! Only way to keep from losing ground to the teacher-hating Nazi element.

    ReplyDelete
  42. They focused only on core subject teachers. We spend a trememdous amount of money on Title 1 and Sp. Ed. teachers and there is little accountability for them. Many spend little to no time with students. It is really a rip-off to taxpayers and to the students.

    ReplyDelete
  43. They need to focus on the many academic coaches who do little or nothing. One at Tech does nothing but eat and talk about eating.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Unfortunately, it is the principals that need to be held accountable for the Title 1 teachers not educating students. At one elementary school, students have not been seen since before Christmas because those teachers are dibbling. That's crap. They are doing what they are told to do by their administrators but the students suffer.

    ReplyDelete
  45. The minutes for the Jan. 19 board meeting name the two teachers who were actually terminated.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Yep. And it also lists Sally Callahan's retirement. Yeah! I'm going to throw a party for her. Of course, I'm not going to invite her!! Anybody want to come?

    ReplyDelete
  47. Tim Clevenger, you are such a hater. I was the only one who held you accountable.

    ReplyDelete
  48. For the past 4 years Jim Hill has been in my building(s) working with my principals and fellow teachers...I have been teaching in IPS for 25 years. He is the first advisor, administrator, type that is direct, honest and works for his money. If you know and don't like him, you are lazy or a malcontent.

    ReplyDelete

Followers